University of Minnesota logo
Department of Family Social ScienceCollege of Education and Human Development

University of Minnesota
College of Education and Human Development
Department of Family Social Science

Close Window
Print

Minnesota Family Formation Project: Mentor Couples
 

Be a Mentor Couple...
for couples who want to stay together to raise their baby.

Does This Profile Fit You?

  • A stable, healthy marriage.
  • Open, easy to relate to.
  • A positive attitude.
  • Willing to talk about your own marital journey.
  • Embedded in larger community of support.
  • Want to enrich your own marriage.
  • Want to give back to the community.

What You Would Do:

  • Get trained to mentor one or two young couples.
  • Meet monthly with your couple(s).
  • Have weekly phone or other contact.
  • Participate in occasional group events.
  • Work with the Family Formation Project Team.

How You Can Benefit:

  • Grow your own marriage by helping others grow theirs.
  • Join a dynamic community of married couples.
  • Feel you are helping to revive marriage in distressed communities.
Back to top

Did you know? What research shows:

  • Most unmarried couples having a child together love each other and hope to get married. (1)
  • Children in married, two parent families tend to have better academic outcomes than children from other family structures. (2)
  • Children living with their married, biological parents are less likely to experience child abuse and poverty. (3,4,5)
  • Married partners tend to have better overall health and psychological well-being than those that are single or cohabitate, respectively. (6,7,8)
  • Married men report higher wages than single men and have been found to be more productive and more likely to be promoted. (9)
  • Married women have substantially more economic resources than single women. This leads to better mental and physical well-being. (10)
  1. McLanahan, S., et al. (2003). The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Baseline National Report. (clicking on this link will open a new window)
  2. Jeynes, W.H. (2000). The effects of several of the most common family structures on the academic achievement of eight graders. Marriage and Family Review, 30(1/2), 73-97.
  3. Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1985). Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 197-210.
  4. Margolin, L. (1992). Child abuse by mothers¿ boyfriends: why the overrepresentation? Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 541-551.
  5. Rank, M.R. & Hirschl, T.A. (1999). The economic risk of childhood in America: estimating the probability of poverty across the formative years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 1058.
  6. Ross, C.E., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1990). The impact of the family on health: a decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1059-1078.
  7. Lamb, K.E., Lee, G.R., & DeMaris, A. (2003). Union formation and depression: Selection and relationship effects. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 953-962.
  8. Kim, H.K. & McKenry, P.C. (2002). The relationship between marriage and psychological well-being: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 885-911
  9. Korenman, S. & Neumark, D. (2001). Does marriage really make men more productive? The Journal of Human Resources, 26, 282-307.
  10. Hahn, B.A. (1993). Martial status and women's health: The effect of economic marital acquisitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 495-504.
Back to top